top of page

Research Quest on testing muscle capacity

Research Quest on testing muscle capacity
Top 10 Research Quests from Research Raconteur

Are you ready to clinically conquer?

  • FREE Top 10 Research Quests ebook (as voted for by over 5,000 clinicians)

  • FREE infographical summaries on the latest
    clinical research

  • FREE membership to all future Research Quests

Here is an interesting new theory on increasing muscle strength that was only created in 2016.


Instead of training with a percentage of your 1 rep max, there’s some evidence that using an RIR-based RPE scale might be superior.


What is an RIR-based RPE scale?


RIR stands for “repetitions in reserve” and RPE stands for rate of perceived exhaustion.


The idea is that due to differences in genetics and training background, the amount of reps at a specific one rep max percentage can vary greatly between individuals (Richens and Cleather, 2014).


So if I can do 5 reps at 70% of the weight of my heaviest squat, you might be able to do 10 reps at 70% of the weight of your heaviest squat.


You might think that as a practitioner, you’re prescribing an individualized program by using a percentage of their 1 rep max but you still might be under-loading or overloading your athlete.


So how do we improve this?


Researchers then suggested that we ask each athlete how hard was that set so that we can get an RPE rating out of 10 to help figure out if the intensity was too high, too low, or just right (Goldilocks would approve).



Yet there was another problem. We’re terrible at estimating how hard or how easy something is.


Three studies (Shimano et a., 2006; Pritchett et al., 2009; Hackett et al., 2012) found that when participants exercised until they could not do another single rep and went to muscular failure, they would rate the exercise anywhere between 6.8 - 9 out of 10.


There’s still too much individual difference for us to feel confident that our prescriptions are specific and accurate.


In comes a researcher named Zourdos, who in 2016 proposed that athletes are quite adept at their ability to gauge how many more times they would be able to lift a weight, or basically, how many repetitions that had in reserve.



In 2016, Helms and colleagues found that it was more accurate than a traditional 0-10 RPE scale for assessing intensity.


In 2017, Hackett and colleagues found that both men and women were able to determine how many times they would be able to lift a certain weight within an accuracy of 1 rep.


Should we be using RIR-based RPE scales rather than 1 Rep Max percentages?


My answer is no.


If you’re trying to regain strength in an injured athlete, I would suggest using all 3 methods. Assign according to their 1RM, then get their RPE out of 10 as well as how many more reps they think they have in store.

Top 10 Research Quests from Research Raconteur

Are you ready to clinically conquer?

  • FREE Top 10 Research Quests ebook (as voted for by over 5,000 clinicians)

  • FREE infographical summaries on the latest
    clinical research

  • FREE membership to all future Research Quests

You're in world-class company:

Over 5 000 clinicians from 40 countries trust us

to bring them the latest studies in clinical injury assessment and rehabilitation.

"These updates help me keep up to date on physiotherapy

evidence-based interventions without needing to search for it in databases.


It really does save time, effort and energy.

My favourite thing is that it is very convenient to learn and read with breakdowns of the information into attractive bite size pieces, making it easy for the reader to digest."

- Candace Goh

"The clinical updates have been a great way to stay up-to-date

on some of the research I may have missed, and also have out some of the grunt work taken out of looking for the research myself while still staying on top of the evidence.

My favorite part of the weekly updates is how easy they are to read!"

- Samantha Greig

"These updates save me a lot of time

and I inform my patients of the updates and what the latest research tells us.

The summary of the articles give me

the most important data in a short but potent way.

Saving me time."

- Denise Gous

"The updates help a lot

in that I'm able to recap on the literature we learned in varsity and it goes more in depth which always helps and it gets me in the groove to read more articles.

My favourite thing about the weekly research updates is how recent the articles are and the humour in the email."

- Bheki Motau

"As a full-time clinician,

there are times when you encounter a rush of patients which reduces the amount of time and effort you may provide to reading research.

This is where these research updates become most useful.

Short and crisp with highlighted findings make the job easier and more effective."

- Payal Adwani

"Just a quick thank you for these emails. Trying to treat patients, get admin done and stay on top of research is such a challenge. 

But these emails make things just a little easier!!"

- Meg Steyn

"The updates have helped stay up to date with research

and there is the added bonus that I am don’t have to sift through all the other articles to find it.

My favourite thing is that

the research is clinically relevant

and easy to understand (even the small bits of information before being given the full article.)"

- Keegan Willemse

"Getting synopses of research weekly enables me to

quickly learn about things that are relevant in the setting where I work

without spending hours researching and analyzing

papers for quality of research to see if something might apply where I work."

- Alyson Hackett

"I have found these updates helpful.

I find the content has a nice variability and covers conditions often seen in an out patient private practice

and therefore very relevant."

- Candace Goh

"Your weekly research update is facilitating me to

change my practices

despite of conventional practice.

I also discuss them with my colleagues in my workplace."

- Rasiah Rakunaraj

"Reading the research and getting better ideas of how we can get the best results for our patients is always welcomed.

 

Nice summarised version which is relatively quick to look through.

Your twist on presenting the research is always fun.

Not too much information all at once and hence the information is digestible and can be worked on. "

- Dr Ron van As

"I am glad to say your updates helped me a lot.

 

Our profession is changing at a very fast pace, sometimes I struggle as a full time clinician to find time to look for new information, sometimes I find the amount of info is overwhelming and confusing.

Your updates save me time and energy, they're very short and on point.

Thank you so much for your effort, I really appreciate it."

- Dr. Eiman Alkhezi

"The Updates have helped me

to be acquainted with information that

guides my practice as a clinician.

My favourite thing about the weekly Research Updates is that it is usually succinct."

- Akinwande Oluwadamilare

"Ensuring I get a summary of the latest papers and then

I can go deeper

into them if I find them relevant for me."

- Bryce Jackson

"I find these updates so helpful.

 

It is often so difficult to find time to read articles when you have your own practice.

Between seeing patients and running your practice it becomes difficult to make sure that you are up to date on the latest rehab techniques and new studies that's been done.

 

I used to spend hours

trying to find relevant articles that actually helps me to treat my patients better.

 

These updates makes it so easy and the best part is

you can apply what you read in your practice.

 

I really feel that it makes a huge difference in my practice and if i need to read the whole article it is right at my finger tips.

 

My favorite thing about these weekly updates is that

I learn something new every week

and then I apply that to my rehab.

I love the fact that I can tell a patient I read this article about their injury and this is the latest an greatest new research about it.

They love it as well.

 

It is like breath of fresh air in my practice."

- Drienie Loock

 
bottom of page